A year later, Charlie Kirk’s death has fractured MAGA

Erika Kirk, who took over as chief executive of Turning Point USA after her husband’s death, has used similarly spiritual language. At the Fox Nation Patriot Awards on November 6, 2025, she warned of “spiritual warfare,” saying her husband “never fled from the spiritual battle that’s ahead” and that “that’s how you know you’re doing the Lord’s work.”

At Turning Point’s AmericaFest in December, she endorsed Vance for president in 2028, telling the crowd, “We are going to get my husband’s friend, JD Vance, elected for 48 in the most resounding way possible.”

A different wing of the movement, made up of figures who have broken with Trump on foreign policy, has used Kirk’s memory for a very different purpose: to argue that the administration has betrayed the “America First” doctrine Kirk championed.

How a Stranded MAGA Has Used Charlie Kirk

The United States joined Israeli strikes on Iran in June 2025, then launched a broader operation against Iran in late February 2026. Former GOP Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene reposted video of Kirk calling regime change in Iran “pathologically insane,” a clip that drew millions of views. She wrote on social media that Trump administration officials were “sick liars,” adding, “We voted for America First and ZERO wars.”

Greene resigned from Congress effective January 2026 and later said she feared being “assassinated like Charlie Kirk” had she stayed in office, tying her departure to what she described as a purge of “America First voices” who opposed the war.

Tucker Carlson has made related claims, saying Kirk “did not like” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and viewed him as “a very destructive force.” Republican Texas Senator Ted Cruz pushed back, saying his “very last conversation” with Kirk was about “the rising, toxic wave of antisemitism on the right.”

Steve Bannon, the former Trump strategist and host of the “War Room” podcast, made a similar case to Newsweek.

“Forget what the Israel First crowd says, Charlie Kirk was adamantly opposed to a regime change war against Iran, adamantly opposed,” Bannon said.

While the White House has avoided commenting on whether Kirk would have supported or opposed the strikes, those who worked with him have largely agreed that he would have supported the president’s actions.

Andrew Kolvet, executive producer of The Charlie Kirk Show, said on a livestream Saturday that Kirk opposed regime change but was “a realist.” Jack Posobiec, a pro-Trump commentator, offered a different read, saying Kirk’s real focus was that young voters “are far more interested in domestic policy” than foreign conflict, adding, “we can’t forget that in a midterm year.”

Newsweek reached out to Turning Point USA and the White House for comment Wednesday and is awaiting responses.

The Veneration of Charlie Kirk

Former Turning Point commentator Candace Owens has gone further than most in shaping Kirk’s legacy, both politically and in more unusual ways. She has argued Kirk was moving toward a break with Israel before he died. She has also made claims about Kirk that verge on the supernatural.

“Charlie and I spoke a lot about his third eye,” Owens said on her podcast. “We spoke about the fact that we could both astral project.”

Erika Kirk has offered her own version of that kind of language. In an interview with Megyn Kelly, she described lights flickering in her home, which she took as a sign of her husband’s presence. “Baby, I feel you, I know you’re here,” she recalled saying.

Kirk’s own record on foreign policy was more complicated than either camp acknowledges. He spent years warning against American intervention abroad and, in a June 17, 2025 broadcast, criticized Republican South Carolina Senator Lindsey Graham over talk of regime change in Iran, saying it “creates a quagmire.”

But he also supported Trump’s strikes on Iranian nuclear sites days later, on June 22. Both the pro-Trump and dissident wings of the movement point to that same record and reach opposite conclusions.

The veneration has taken concrete form as well. Arizona Representative Anna Paulina Luna has called for a statue of Kirk inside the U.S. Capitol. Arizona Representative Abe Hamadeh and Texas Representative August Pfluger introduced legislation directing the Treasury Department to mint 400,000 silver coins bearing Kirk’s image.

GOP Oklahoma State Senator Shane Jett introduced a bill requiring public universities in the state to erect statues of Kirk. Several states have advanced bills establishing a “Charlie Kirk Day” around his October 14 birthday.

The debate over how Kirk’s death should be remembered has also extended to college campuses, where free speech and political expression have become a central part of the discussion.

“The impact of Charlie Kirk’s assassination continues to negatively reverberate on campuses across the country. Rather than view the tragedy as a warning about the extreme results of partisanship and inability to dialogue peacefully, many college admins took it as an invitation to double down on censorship,” FIRE Chief Researcher Sean Stevens said in a statement shared with Newsweek.

Clashes From the Right, and the Anniversary Ahead

In the days after Kirk’s death, Luke Baumgartner, a researcher at George Washington University’s Program on Extremism, told Newsweek that Kirk had occupied a specific role inside the movement. “He framed himself as a relatively accessible voice,” Baumgartner said. “He was young, media-savvy, and focused on mobilization through public engagement and confrontation.”

Baumgartner predicted no successor would soften that role, and, a year later, his words were proven right.

Erika Kirk runs Turning Point USA and has become the movement’s most-visible mourner, but she has not taken on Kirk’s role as its chief provocateur and dealmaker between factions. Vance, Owens, Carlson, Bannon and Greene each have their own followings, yet none has emerged as a clear replacement for Kirk. MAGA remains divided over Iran, Israel and what Kirk actually believed, with competing figures now vying for influence.

Conspiracy theories about Kirk’s death have also circulated, particularly among the dissident wing of the movement. Owens has suggested Kirk was shot “from below the stage” and that the assassin fled through tunnels, and she has raised the possibility of Israeli involvement in his death. Brian Harpole, who served as Kirk’s security chief, sued Owens for defamation in May 2026 over comments tying him to the killing.

Carlson has gone further, telling Bret Weinstein on a podcast in June 2026, “Charlie Kirk was not murdered for his opinions on transgenderism. Obviously. Those of us who knew him best and called him a friend believe he was most likely murdered for his evolving views on Israel.”